2025-05-19
Changing the legal form of a company can be an effective and legal tool for tax optimization
More and more entrepreneurs are considering transforming their general partnership (“spółka jawna”) into a limited partnership (“spółka komandytowa”) in Poland. Although both types of entities are subject to Polish CIT, the latter offers certain tax deductions on the partner-level. But could this change be seen as a tax avoidance scheme?
More and more entrepreneurs are considering transforming their general partnership (“spółka jawna”) into a limited partnership (“spółka komandytowa”) in Poland. Although both types of entities are subject to Polish CIT, the latter offers certain tax deductions on the partner-level. But could this change be seen as a tax avoidance scheme?
A recent ruling from the Head of the National Revenue Administration (reference DKP16.8082.12.2024, dated April 16, 2025) clarifies this issue. It confirms that changing the company’s legal form—even if motivated mainly by tax reasons—is not unlawful as long as it is driven by real and justified business purposes.
In the case analyzed, a general partnership subject to Polish corporate income tax (CIT) planned a transformation where several individuals and one legal entity would become general partners in the new limited partnership, with another legal entity acting as the limited partner. The reasons behind this change included facilitating family succession, unification of the legal form/structure across the groups, and reducing operational and tax costs.
The Head of the Revenue Administration pointed out that the tax benefits, such as lowering personal income tax arise from mechanisms provided by law (art. 30a(6a-6e) of the PIT Act and art. 22(1a-1e) of the CIT Act). This is not a violation of regulations but a legal tax optimization, constitutionally protected as the freedom to conduct business.
Importantly, the transformation is neither artificial nor abusive; it is economically justified and therefore does not constitute tax avoidance. The Head emphasized that taxpayers have the right to choose the business structure that enables legal tax optimization. Carrying out business activities in a form resulting in the highest possible tax burden was not the intended purpose of the changes introduced by the Polish lawmakers.
Takeaway?
If carefully planned and supported by genuine business reasons, changing the legal form of a company can be an effective and legal tool for tax optimization.
See other articles
Can a shareholder derive taxable income from receiving a claim that they will never be able to enforce? According to the Polish tax authorities, the answer is yes. It is sufficient for the claim to be transferred to the shareholder as part of the distribution of liquidation assets, even if the shareholder is also the debtor and the obligation is extinguished as a result of confusio. This position was presented by the Director of the Polish National Tax Information Service in an individual tax ruling dated 21 July 2026, ref. 0115-KDWT.4011.203.2026.2.DS. The ruling confirms the restrictive approach adopted by the Polish tax authorities: first, the shareholder receives the claim, and only then is it extinguished. According to the authority, the first stage alone is sufficient to give rise to taxable income.
Reform of Poland’s tax ruling system: five-year validity and centralisation of municipal tax rulings
Businesses engaged in distance selling often issue an invoice as soon as goods leave the warehouse. Where delivery is handled by a third-party carrier, however, the actual date on which the supply takes place may not yet be known. This raises the question of whether the seller may issue an invoice without specifying the date of supply and whether, once delivery has been confirmed, the missing date must be added by means of a corrective invoice. These issues were addressed by the Director of Poland’s National Revenue Information Service (KIS) in an individual tax ruling dated 14 July 2026, reference no. 0114-KDIP1-2.4012.236.2026.2.RM. The ruling may be particularly relevant to businesses operating in the e-commerce, manufacturing and logistics sectors, especially where deliveries take place around the end of a VAT reporting period.
Reform of Poland’s tax ruling system: five-year validity and centralisation of municipal tax rulings
Poland’s Ministry of Finance is preparing a comprehensive reform of the rules governing the issuance and operation of tax rulings. Draft Bill UD445 provides, among other things, for a five-year validity period for individual tax rulings, a procedure for extending their protective effect, broader protection covering tax consequences arising before a ruling is served, and new grounds on which existing rulings may cease to apply. Draft Bill UD450, in turn, would transfer responsibility for issuing rulings on taxes and charges administered by municipal tax authorities to the Director of the National Tax Information Service. Not all elements of the reform are at the same stage of the legislative process. Draft Bills UD445 and UD450 have not yet been enacted. However, legislation requiring municipal tax rulings to be published in the central EUREKA tax rulings database has already been adopted. When assessing the implications of the reform, it is therefore important to distinguish between enacted measures and legislative proposals whose final wording may still change.
Poland’s draft bill UD116 could significantly change the tax treatment of certain entrepreneurs operating under B2B arrangements. The proposed rules would not abolish self-employment or Poland’s lump-sum tax regime on recorded revenue. However, they are intended to reduce the tax attractiveness of certain structures, particularly transactions with related parties, service businesses operating without employees, and the use of the Polish IP Box regime.
The Act of 29 May 2026 amending the Polish Tax Ordinance and certain other acts, signed by the President of Poland, introduces significant changes to the Polish rules on reporting tax schemes, commonly referred to as MDR, or Mandatory Disclosure Rules. The new MDR provisions are expected to enter into force on 1 October 2026 and will substantially narrow the scope of obligations which, since 2019, have been one of the more demanding elements of tax compliance in Poland.
Tax proceedings in Poland should not be a process in which only the tax authority decides which facts will be examined and which evidence will be taken into account. Under the Polish Tax Ordinance Act, taxpayers have the right to actively participate in proceedings, including the right to submit their own requests for evidence. In practice, however, not every piece of evidence proposed by a taxpayer will be admitted. When can the tax authority refuse an evidentiary request, and what options are available to taxpayers in such situations?
Determining when a VAT liability arises in relation to services remains one of the more challenging issues in practice under Polish VAT law. Although Article 19a(1) of the Polish VAT Act clearly states that VAT becomes due when a service is performed, establishing when a service is actually “performed” sometimes requires a case-by-case assessment of the contractual model and the underlying commercial reality. Recent Polish judgment by the Supreme Administrative Court of 31 March 2026 (I FSK 1353/23) provides important clarification in the context of IT services.
As the Polish National e-Invoicing System (KSeF) becomes more widely used, businesses are increasingly encountering a practical issue known as the “double document circulation.” This occurs when the structured invoice stored in KSeF (XML) differs from the PDF visualization sent to the customer, for example by email or through a customer portal.
On 11 February, the EU General Court (Case T-689/24) delivered an important judgment in a “Polish case” on the moment of input VAT deduction. The ruling may have far-reaching consequences for Polish businesses and the way VAT is settled in Poland.
Invoice Issued Outside KSeF and Tax-Deductible Costs. Key Position of the Polish tax administration.
Individual tax ruling of 9 January 2026, ref. 0111-KDIB1-3.4010.714.2025.2.JG In an individual tax ruling dated 9 January 2026, the Director of the Polish National Revenue Information (KIS) addressed an issue that has raised significant practical concerns in the context of the implementation of the National e-Invoicing System (KSeF). The key question was whether an expense documented by an invoice issued outside the KSeF-system may be treated as a tax-deductible cost for the purposes of Polish corporate income tax (CIT).