Reform of Poland’s tax ruling system: five-year validity and centralisation of municipal tax rulings

2026-08-25

Businesses engaged in distance selling often issue an invoice as soon as goods leave the warehouse. Where delivery is handled by a third-party carrier, however, the actual date on which the supply takes place may not yet be known. This raises the question of whether the seller may issue an invoice without specifying the date of supply and whether, once delivery has been confirmed, the missing date must be added by means of a corrective invoice. These issues were addressed by the Director of Poland’s National Revenue Information Service (KIS) in an individual tax ruling dated 14 July 2026, reference no. 0114-KDIP1-2.4012.236.2026.2.RM. The ruling may be particularly relevant to businesses operating in the e-commerce, manufacturing and logistics sectors, especially where deliveries take place around the end of a VAT reporting period.

When does a supply of goods take place for VAT purposes?

The case concerned a company making domestic and cross-border supplies of goods through third-party carriers. Domestic transport took between two and seven days, while international deliveries could take up to several weeks. The transactions were carried out under the Incoterms DAP rule.

According to the facts presented by the company, the right to dispose of the goods as owner passed to the customer only when the consignment was collected from the carrier. Consequently, the release of the goods from the warehouse and the commencement of transport did not yet constitute a supply within the meaning of Article 7(1) of the Polish VAT Act.

Determining the date of supply requires a case-by-case assessment of when the customer acquires the effective ability to dispose of the goods as owner. This does not necessarily coincide with the formal transfer of legal title. The contractual provisions, the agreed allocation of risk and the way in which the transaction is performed in practice are all particularly relevant.

Although Incoterms rules may form an important part of this assessment, they do not, in themselves, determine when a supply takes place for VAT purposes. It is also necessary to establish the legal and commercial consequences that the parties have actually attached to the agreed delivery terms.

 

An invoice may be issued before the supply takes place

The company intended to issue invoices when the goods were handed over to the carrier. As a general rule, this is permitted under Article 106i(7) of the Polish VAT Act, which provides that an invoice may not be issued more than 60 days before the supply takes place or before all or part of the payment is received.

The difficulty was that, when issuing the invoice, the company did not know the date on which the consignment would actually be collected. The delivery date could change for reasons beyond its control, and the relevant information would only become available later from transport documents, proof of delivery or the carrier’s tracking system.

The company therefore proposed issuing invoices without specifying the date of supply and subsequently recording them in its VAT records for the period in which the goods were actually collected by the customers.

 

An unknown date of supply does not have to appear on the invoice

The Director of KIS agreed with the company’s position. The authority referred to Article 106e(1)(6) of the Polish VAT Act, under which an invoice must state the date on which the supply of goods was made or completed, provided that this date has been determined and differs from the invoice issue date.

Where the date of supply is objectively unknown when the invoice is issued, this condition is not met. The taxpayer may therefore issue an invoice without specifying the date of supply, and the invoice remains formally valid.

The ruling should not, however, be interpreted as granting taxpayers a general right to omit the date of supply. It applies to a specific model in which the invoice is issued before the supply takes place and the actual delivery date cannot yet be established. If the supply has already taken place or its date is known, that date should be included on the invoice if it differs from the invoice issue date.

 

Establishing the date later does not require a corrective invoice

KIS also confirmed that the company would not be required to issue a corrective invoice once it had obtained information confirming the actual date on which the goods were collected.

A corrective invoice is required, among other circumstances, where an error has been identified in the original document. In the case under consideration, however, the omission of the delivery date did not constitute an error. The invoice was correct in light of the circumstances existing when it was issued because the relevant date had not yet been determined. Establishing that date at a later stage does not alter the original invoice’s status or create an obligation to supplement it.

This is an important conclusion for businesses that have previously entered an estimated date of supply on their invoices and subsequently issued corrections whenever the goods reached the customer on a different date.

 

Omitting the date from the invoice does not affect the VAT reporting period

The simplification concerning invoicing does not alter the rules governing the tax point. Under Article 19a(1) of the Polish VAT Act, VAT generally becomes chargeable when the goods are supplied. Issuing an invoice in advance does not bring the tax point forward.

For example, if an invoice is issued on 29 September but the customer collects the consignment on 2 October and, under the agreed terms, acquires the right to dispose of the goods as owner only on that date, the transaction should be reported for October.

The seller must therefore still establish and document the actual date of supply. This information is necessary to report the transaction in the correct VAT period, even if it is not shown on the invoice. In practice, this may require the accounting system to be integrated with warehouse records and data received from carriers.

 

Consequences for the customer

Receiving an invoice before delivery does not automatically entitle the customer to deduct input VAT. Under Article 86(10) and Article 86(10b)(1) of the Polish VAT Act, the right to deduct generally arises in the period in which VAT becomes chargeable in respect of the purchased goods, but no earlier than the period in which the taxpayer receives the invoice.

If the customer receives an invoice towards the end of a month but the goods are not delivered until the following month, input VAT should not be deducted in the period in which the invoice was received. The actual date of supply must instead be established on the basis of transport documents, proof of delivery or other reliable evidence.

 

Practical implications for businesses

The ruling confirms that an invoice should be assessed by reference to the information available when it was issued. A taxpayer cannot be required to state a delivery date that could not objectively have been determined at that time or subsequently correct a document that complied with the statutory requirements from the outset.

Before adopting this approach, however, businesses should review their terms of sale, determine when economic control over the goods passes to the customer and establish how delivery is documented. The flow of information between the logistics and accounting functions may also need to be adjusted. Omitting the date of supply from an invoice may simplify the invoicing process, but it does not remove the obligation to determine the correct VAT reporting period.

It should also be remembered that an individual tax ruling directly protects only the applicant and only in relation to the facts described in the application. For other businesses, the ruling provides valuable interpretative guidance, but adopting a similar approach should be preceded by an analysis of their specific delivery model.

See other articles

2026-08-25

Businesses engaged in distance selling often issue an invoice as soon as goods leave the warehouse. Where delivery is handled by a third-party carrier, however, the actual date on which the supply takes place may not yet be known. This raises the question of whether the seller may issue an invoice without specifying the date of supply and whether, once delivery has been confirmed, the missing date must be added by means of a corrective invoice. These issues were addressed by the Director of Poland’s National Revenue Information Service (KIS) in an individual tax ruling dated 14 July 2026, reference no. 0114-KDIP1-2.4012.236.2026.2.RM. The ruling may be particularly relevant to businesses operating in the e-commerce, manufacturing and logistics sectors, especially where deliveries take place around the end of a VAT reporting period.
Read more

2026-08-19

Poland’s Ministry of Finance is preparing a comprehensive reform of the rules governing the issuance and operation of tax rulings. Draft Bill UD445 provides, among other things, for a five-year validity period for individual tax rulings, a procedure for extending their protective effect, broader protection covering tax consequences arising before a ruling is served, and new grounds on which existing rulings may cease to apply. Draft Bill UD450, in turn, would transfer responsibility for issuing rulings on taxes and charges administered by municipal tax authorities to the Director of the National Tax Information Service. Not all elements of the reform are at the same stage of the legislative process. Draft Bills UD445 and UD450 have not yet been enacted. However, legislation requiring municipal tax rulings to be published in the central EUREKA tax rulings database has already been adopted. When assessing the implications of the reform, it is therefore important to distinguish between enacted measures and legislative proposals whose final wording may still change.
Read more

2026-07-16

Poland’s draft bill UD116 could significantly change the tax treatment of certain entrepreneurs operating under B2B arrangements. The proposed rules would not abolish self-employment or Poland’s lump-sum tax regime on recorded revenue. However, they are intended to reduce the tax attractiveness of certain structures, particularly transactions with related parties, service businesses operating without employees, and the use of the Polish IP Box regime.
Read more

2026-07-08

The Act of 29 May 2026 amending the Polish Tax Ordinance and certain other acts, signed by the President of Poland, introduces significant changes to the Polish rules on reporting tax schemes, commonly referred to as MDR, or Mandatory Disclosure Rules. The new MDR provisions are expected to enter into force on 1 October 2026 and will substantially narrow the scope of obligations which, since 2019, have been one of the more demanding elements of tax compliance in Poland.
Read more

2026-06-18

Tax proceedings in Poland should not be a process in which only the tax authority decides which facts will be examined and which evidence will be taken into account. Under the Polish Tax Ordinance Act, taxpayers have the right to actively participate in proceedings, including the right to submit their own requests for evidence. In practice, however, not every piece of evidence proposed by a taxpayer will be admitted. When can the tax authority refuse an evidentiary request, and what options are available to taxpayers in such situations?
Read more

2026-05-19

Determining when a VAT liability arises in relation to services remains one of the more challenging issues in practice under Polish VAT law. Although Article 19a(1) of the Polish VAT Act clearly states that VAT becomes due when a service is performed, establishing when a service is actually “performed” sometimes requires a case-by-case assessment of the contractual model and the underlying commercial reality. Recent Polish judgment by the Supreme Administrative Court of 31 March 2026 (I FSK 1353/23) provides important clarification in the context of IT services.
Read more

2026-03-18

As the Polish National e-Invoicing System (KSeF) becomes more widely used, businesses are increasingly encountering a practical issue known as the “double document circulation.” This occurs when the structured invoice stored in KSeF (XML) differs from the PDF visualization sent to the customer, for example by email or through a customer portal.
Read more

2026-03-09

On 11 February, the EU General Court (Case T-689/24) delivered an important judgment in a “Polish case” on the moment of input VAT deduction. The ruling may have far-reaching consequences for Polish businesses and the way VAT is settled in Poland.
Read more

2026-02-26

Individual tax ruling of 9 January 2026, ref. 0111-KDIB1-3.4010.714.2025.2.JG In an individual tax ruling dated 9 January 2026, the Director of the Polish National Revenue Information (KIS) addressed an issue that has raised significant practical concerns in the context of the implementation of the National e-Invoicing System (KSeF). The key question was whether an expense documented by an invoice issued outside the KSeF-system may be treated as a tax-deductible cost for the purposes of Polish corporate income tax (CIT).
Read more

2026-02-12

The introduction of the mandatory Polish e-invoicing system (Krajowy System e-Faktur – KSeF) as of 1 February 2026 will significantly change VAT invoicing rules, i.a. transactions involving foreign entities. One of the key factors determining whether mandatory KSeF applies is whether a foreign counterparty has a fixed establishment (FE) in Poland. If it is lacking on the seller’s side, then he may issue and send invoices outside KSeF (e.g. via e-mail, PDF). If the seller is subject to KSeF yet his buyer is not (lacking seat/FE in Poland), then the seller must issue the invoice via KSeF, yet simultaneously send it to his buyer in the old-fashioned way.
Read more

Reform of Poland’s tax ruling system: five-year validity and centralisation of municipal tax rulings

Zamknij